Social Psychology

The author is associated with, which is a global custom writing company. If you would like help in custom writing or term paper writingand essays, you can visit

The history of Social Psychology

I have to chosen to investigate the history of Social Psychology for the year 1967, the year I was born. During this year, the articles in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology have a number of patterns that are quite peculiar. Over the past years, this journal has been presenting a number of important social and psychological years and the year 1967 was not an exception. In the year 1967, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published a number of papers in different areas such as social psychology and human personality. It as well gave a number of emphases on some empirical reports, which came with specialized methodological and even experimental papers (Henry, 2008). From the year, the journal came with three parts: the social cognition and attitudes part, which addressed the major domains within social behaviors, human motivations and conduct. With some specified sense of presentation, the journal covered issues of change, and use of attitudes, stereotypes and attributions.

During this year, the journal seemed to have a number of topics more popular than the others. For instance, majority of the articles relied much on individual studies, human differences, and the processes of behaviors, their emotions, health, motivation, and how to cope with human attributes, and a few phenomenon reflecting personality. According to me, I can say that there was a great deal of articles in the areas of personality structure, human development personality, personality assessment. This means that there was a great representation of culture and human personality, and everyday behavior. However, the journal for 1967 has as well a number of articles on interpersonalrelations and processes in-grouporientations (Henry, 2008). These few articles focused much on the psychological and the structural features within different groups and dyads.

I can say this have been a pure coincidence on the fact that the year I was born seemed to come with a journal, which has interesting articles on human psychology, behavior and personality. From the journal, about forty-two percent of the participants used appear to have been college students in different levels of education. This was so because their practical applications in the study would be of great help. However, the greatest percentages of the participants were individuals in social psychology and related professions. As well, majority of the articles and participants in the journal of 1967 were males and a small percent of females. On average, seventeen percent of the authors were female with majority of them being not really authors, but co-authors (Freedheim & Weiner, 2003). The greatest share of the authorship was dominated by males.

From the journal, I have been able to establish that a number of methodological designs were common with most of them being correctional studies. These had been done in correctional institutions in collaboration with college students. However, a lesser percentage of about thirty-one consisted of experimental studies. Generally, about forty percent of the studies integrated archival methods with the remaining consisting of observational methods. From majority of the researches done and presented in this journal, majority of the studies were able to discuss a number of ethical aspects, which included informed consent towards doing what would be appropriate. Basically, with informed consent, we can see that majority of the individuals were agreeing to participate in the studies and research methodologies despite potential risks involved, and hence they had the freedom of withdrawing from the studies at any given time should they feel like. Another important ethical aspect was deception, which has been noted in only two articles in the journal (Fletcher & Garth, 2002). From the journal for 1967, I have been able to acquaint myself with professional and peer reviewed articles, which are important and greatly scholarly. Finally, I have been able to note a number of issues that are relevant to methodology in the journal. It is quite true that psychologists would use scientific methods whenever conducting research and studies in the field of psychology. The basic processes, therefore, for conducting such psychological researches as seen in the journal have involved asking of questions, designing of the study, collection of the needed data, analysis of the results that have been obtained, reaching useful conclusions, and finally sharing the results and findings in a journal to the outside world.


Fletcher, M. & Garth, J.O. (2002). Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Freedheim, K. & Weiner, I. (2003). Handbook of Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Henry, K. (2008). A Guide to Journal of personality and social psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.